http://movesonrails.com/ en-us 40 New ways to look at software Sorry, fixed it :) Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:42:59 +0100 urn:uuid:bdfafd49-992e-4a94-a874-6d51c1465df2 http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/08/14/rails-log-analyzer#comment-331 thx this was very useful ! Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:43:48 +0100 urn:uuid:6b56e362-8a03-43bf-9edb-d27f1eceeba4 http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/01/23/spec-ing-your-application-controller#comment-329 This is called 'humor' Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:59:58 +0100 urn:uuid:7911bc10-23b1-474f-b293-ab9200182b4e http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/26/ror-workshop-26-nov-2008#comment-327 Nice sheet design, wonder what the presentation itself looked and felt like. Minor negative note: the "catspeak"-warped spelling made me feel like I'm reading something an eleven year old wrote, though it may have been presented with a humourous twist. Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:22:33 +0100 urn:uuid:043b55f7-f893-457b-857c-bccabf7af627 http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/26/ror-workshop-26-nov-2008#comment-326 I do wonder how effective these harsh terms would prove in a court of law. Law is all but an exact business, and I could imagine some of these terms being ripped to shreds in a legal dispute. Especially consumers receive significant protection against unreasonable terms in the Netherlands. Unfortunately, taking a dispute to court is a costly decision. Besides, you'd rather pick a reasonable supplier and not have the dispute at all. Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:10:13 +0100 urn:uuid:dd073cf0-c91a-437a-b818-9f76be7c40f9 http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/27/trust#comment-325 Hey Bart, Could you please repost the example run link...I'm getting a page doesnt exist error ... thanks. Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:12:08 +0100 urn:uuid:775de7c3-39d6-452a-8376-f41d534c1b0d http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/08/14/rails-log-analyzer#comment-324 I agree. The 'everything is an object' filosofy is easy to explain and powerful! Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:42:07 +0100 urn:uuid:acfe640e-1c0b-4bfe-a96b-4cc73b34db97 http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/26/ror-workshop-26-nov-2008#comment-323 Very nice! Ruby is also great to teach Object-Oriented programming to students. Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:00:54 +0100 urn:uuid:336b4fc6-c34a-4165-ace6-891bdbfb150e http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/26/ror-workshop-26-nov-2008#comment-322 It is, but still it's no excuse for the 'easy-way-out' clause. It's time software developers started taking some responsibility for what they build. The IT sector isn't in it's infancy stage anymore, time to be grown-ups! Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:39:25 +0100 urn:uuid:d8edc1cb-e3de-4d04-9513-6dc5d211983a http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/27/trust#comment-321 Absolutely. You can state things like that with random pieces of code you fling around on the net (the old "this software is provided as is, without representation as to its fitness for any purpose" clause), but not if you are at all serious about a service you are providing. I'm afraid it's it's a result of the claim culture. Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:36:03 +0100 urn:uuid:aac1bd20-0dd9-426f-ad51-0d1b378c5054 http://movesonrails.com/articles/2008/11/27/trust#comment-320